The jury pays Roy Moore 8.2 million Dollar in a defamation lawsuit – Senate Majority PAC’s counsel intends to appeal the judgement in Moore’s case in the hopes of reversing it. A federal jury awarded Roy Moore $8.2 million in damages on Friday after determining that a Democratic-aligned super PAC defamed him in a TV commercial that recounted sexual misconduct allegations made against him during his unsuccessful 2017 Alabama Senate campaign.
The jury determined that the Senate Majority PAC made false and defamatory assertions about Moore in an advertisement that intended to spotlight Moore’s charges. The conviction, rendered by a jury after a quick trial in Anniston, Alabama, was a triumph for Moore, who had previously lost defamation cases against Sacha Baron Cohen and others.
Moore said in a telephone interview, “We are really grateful to God for the chance to help repair my reputation, which was seriously harmed by the 2017 election.” Ben Stafford, an attorney for Senate Majority PAC, said in an email that he believes the verdict will be reversed on appeal.
Moore, a former Republican judge renowned for his staunch opposition to same-sex marriage and advocacy for the public display of the Ten Commandments, lost the 2017 Senate election after accusations of misbehavior rocked his campaign. Leigh Corfman told The Washington Post that in 1979, when she was 14 and Moore was 32 and an associate district attorney, Moore sexually assaulted her. Moore refuted the charge. According to several women, Moore dated them or asked them out when they were older teenagers.
Moore’s defeat to Doug Jones, the first Democrat to represent Alabama in the Senate in a quarter-century, was aided by the allegations against him. With the election of Tommy Tuberville, a former collegiate football coach, in 2020, the seat restored to Republican control.
The Senate Majority PAC financed Highway 31, a nonprofit that launched a $4 million advertising campaign against Moore.
The complaint focused on one television advertisement that detailed Moore’s charges. Moore’s lawyers contended the juxtaposition of words in the advertisement erroneously stated he sought sex from young girls at a shopping mall, including another 14-year-old who was working as a Santa’s helper, and that he was barred from the mall as a consequence.
The commercial started, “What do those who know Roy Moore have to say?” Moore was really barred from the Gadsden mall… for soliciting sex from young girls, and one of the girls he contacted was 14 years old and working as a Santa’s helper.
Wendy Miller testified in the past that she met Moore when she was 14 and working as a Santa’s helper at a local mall. She stated Moore complimented her appearance, inquired about her high school, and offered to buy her a beverage. Two years later, he asked her out, but her mother disallowed it.
Moore’s lawyers stated that the juxtaposition of lines in the advertisement inaccurately portrayed Moore and gave the impression that he solicited sex from mall girls. “In their advertisement, quotations were stitched together to form a single message. The jury considered this to be objectionable. They stood up and claimed that they didn’t mean to do that “Moore’s attorney, Jeffrey Scott Wittenbrink, said the following.
The Senate Majority PAC said that the ad was mostly accurate and that there were several accusations of Moore’s bad conduct at the mall. An counsel said that an appeal was planned. J.D. Thomas, a Gadsden police officer who handled security at the Gadsden Mall in the late 1970s, said Thursday that he warned Moore not to return to the mall after getting reports from shop owners that Moore was asking out juvenile workers or making them feel uncomfortable. Moore said he was never barred from the shopping centre.
“Multiple persons testified under oath to confirm Moore’s legitimate charges, and no amount of deflection or diversion will alter this truth. At great personal expense, several more have stepped forward to make their charges public. We disagree with this judgement, but we feel the facts are clear and that this ruling will be reversed on appeal “Attorney Stafford, who represents Senate Majority PAC, said in an email statement.
|OL News||Click Here|